Tool
Enter failure modes and ratings
Core formula: RPN = Severity x Occurrence x Detection
Use one row per failure mode in the format: `Failure mode, Effect, S, O, D, New S, New O, New D`
Calculator Library / FMEA
Score failure modes with Severity, Occurrence, and Detection values, calculate RPN and Action Priority, and test before-and-after mitigation scenarios inside a sortable FMEA table.
Tool
Core formula: RPN = Severity x Occurrence x Detection
Use one row per failure mode in the format: `Failure mode, Effect, S, O, D, New S, New O, New D`
Thresholds
Rows with AP = High or RPN above the working threshold should move to immediate action planning.
Mode summary: Classic mode uses a pragmatic RPN threshold overlay, while AIAG/VDA mode maps the combination to an action priority band.
After-mitigation view: use the recalculated RPN and AP to judge whether additional controls are still required.
Simulator
| Failure Mode | Before RPN | After RPN | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seal leak | 216 | 72 | 144 |
Module
| Recommended Action | New RPN | New AP | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seal leak | Customer complaint | 9 | 4 | 6 | 216 | High | Immediate action plan | 72 | Medium |
Instructions
Classic RPN is still useful for prioritization, but Action Priority gives more weight to high-severity scenarios even when the numeric RPN is not extreme.
The built-in AP logic here is a practical approximation for day-to-day FMEA work. If your customer or plant uses a stricter AIAG/VDA interpretation, align the rules to that local standard.
This tool converts Severity, Occurrence, and Detection ratings into immediate risk logic. It helps teams compare classic RPN scoring with AIAG-VDA-style Action Priority thinking, then test how mitigation changes the before-versus-after risk picture.
That makes it useful during PFMEA workshops, launch reviews, corrective-action follow-up, and control-plan decisions where teams need to move quickly without losing scoring rigor.
| Concept | Formula or Logic | Use |
|---|---|---|
| RPN | Severity x Occurrence x Detection | Classic numerical ranking of failure risk. |
| Action Priority | Banding based on S, O, D combination | AIAG-VDA decision logic for high / medium / low action urgency. |
| Before / after delta | Original RPN - revised RPN | Shows whether the proposed action actually reduces risk. |
Suppose a seal leak has Severity 9, Occurrence 4, and Detection 6. The classic RPN is 216, which clearly demands action. If the team upgrades the process control and inspection so the revised scores become 7, 2, and 4, the new RPN becomes 56.
The main question is not whether the number got smaller. The real question is whether the prevention and detection changes are real, assigned, and strong enough to justify the lower rating. This tool makes that comparison visible.
RPN is a multiplication result. Action Priority is a decision framework that gives more weight to severe combinations even when the raw multiplication can be misleading.
Yes, especially when safety, regulatory, or critical customer function is involved. High severity should trigger disciplined review even if occurrence is low.
Yes. Different combinations of Severity, Occurrence, and Detection can produce the same RPN while implying very different action urgency.
Use it to challenge whether a mitigation plan truly lowers occurrence or improves detection, rather than assuming every action deserves a lower score.
Scoring by opinion without shared definitions or evidence. Inconsistent scoring weakens every downstream action decision.
Move directly from calculator-level scoring into a full PFMEA worksheet with owners, controls, and rescoring fields.
Use the guide when the team needs stronger logic on scoring consistency, mitigation planning, and review cadence.